The indicators describe current developments in these market segments from three perspectives: in terms of prices, the real economy and financing. These indicator systems provide an overview of the situation on Germany’s residential and commercial real estate markets. Systems of indicators for real estate markets No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Sets of indicators group together statistical information from different statistical domains to provide a compact overview of particular topics.
#Banking system indicators license
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. (August 11, 2011), "Identifying Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs)." Deutsche Bank Research. Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. (June 3, 2011), "Regulating Systemically Important Financial Firms." Speech at the Peter G. (2013), "An Additional Capital Requirement Based on the Domestic Systemic Importance of a Bank." CNB Financial Stability Report 2012-2013, pp.
NBU (2012), Main Indicators of Ukrainian Banks. NBU (2001), Instruction on Regulation of Banks in Ukraine. IMF (October 2012), Global Financial Stability Report. (January 16, 2011), "Identifying and Regulating Systemically Important Financial Institutions: The Risks of Under and Over Identification and Regulation." Brookings Policy Brief. ECB (October 5, 2009), "Recent Advances in Modelling Systemic Risk Using Network Analysis." Paper presented on the workshop in Frankfurt. (March 2011), "Systemic Importance: Some Simple Indicators." BIS Quarterly Review. (2009), "Are Banks too Big to Fail?" Research Department of the Netherlands Central Bank Working Papers No. Houghton Miffin Company, The Riverside Press, Cambridge. (1925), Principles and Methods of Statistics. (December 2011), "Domestic Systemically Important Banks: An IndicatorBased Measurement Approach for the Australian Banking System." Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg Working Paper No. BCBS (August 2012), Consultative document "A Framework for Dealing with Domestic Systemically Important Banks.". BCBS (November 2011), Consultative document "Global Systemically Important Banks: Assessment Methodology and the Additional Loss Absorbency Requirement.". (2001), "Measures of Competition and Concentration: A Review of Literature", De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam. (2009), "A Theory of Systemic Risk and Design of Prudential Bank Regulation." Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. Keywords: systemic risk, systemic importance indicator, size, risk-based bank supervision, interconnectedness JEL classification: E58, G18, G21 In our opinion, the best solution for systemic risk regulation would be the introduction of a differentiated regime of supervision over banks depending on their level of systemic importance and risk profile. We have discovered the absence of banks with high systemic importance in the period 2007-2011 - the majo-rity of banks are characterized by their moderate or low level. The approach was tested on 26 Ukrainian banks representing different groups (depending on the size of assets) according to the classification of the National Bank of Ukraine. By improving both a set of criteria and indicators of a bank's systemic importance it is offered to distinguish its five levels - low, moderate, medium, significant and high. Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine, Sumy, Ukraine study offers a scientific and methodical approach to identifying systemically important domestic banks based on the indicator-based measurement approach recommended by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine, Sumy, Ukraine 3 
Ukrainian Academy of Banking of the National Bank of Ukraine, Sumy, Ukraine 2 Prague Economic Papers 2015, 24(6):715-728 | DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.531 Systematically Important Domestic Banks: An Indicator-Based Measurement Approach for the Ukrainian Banking System Anna Buriak 1, Serhiy Lyeonov 2, Tetiana Vasylieva 3 1
0 kommentar(er)
